Warning: package 'DT' was built under R version 4.5.1Bedenlenmiş Biliş: Kaynakça ve Terimce
Note
Bedenlenmiş Biliş ve Bedenlenmiş Dil, zihin ve dilin bedenle, duyumotor sistemle ve çevresel etkileşimlerle nasıl iç içe geçtiğini inceleyen disiplinlerarası bir alandır. Bu yaklaşım, düşünmenin yalnızca soyut bir işlem değil, bedensel deneyimlerimizle şekillenen köklü bir süreç olduğunu savunur. Bu sayfa CogIST tarafından organize edilen ve eğitimcisi olduğum Bedenlenmiş Biliş ve Dil dersi için hazırlanmıştır. Dilsel kavrayıştan kavramsal yapılandırmaya, metaforlardan uzamsal düşünmeye kadar pek çok olguyu bu perspektiften ele alan ders, klasik bilişsel kuramlarla karşılaştırmalı bir çerçeve sunar. Katılımcılar, hem kuramsal tartışmalarla hem de güncel araştırmalarla bedenlenmiş yaklaşıma dair derinlemesine bir anlayış geliştirme fırsatı bulacaklardır. Bu sayfada dersin temelini oluşturan metinleri ve terimleri Türkçe karşılıklarıyla birlikte bulabilirsiniz.
Temel Metinler
Felsefi Temeller
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
Kökenler
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–609; discussion 610–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99252144
Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without reason. Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1, 569–595.
Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000010
Haugeland, J. (1993). Mind embodied and embedded. In Y.-H. H. Houng & J. Ho (Eds.), Mind and cognition: 1993 International Symposium (pp. 233–267). Academica Sinica.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
Johnson, M. (1990). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000115
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Güçlü (radikal) bedenlenme
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT Press.
Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. Hill & Wang.
Davranışsal etkiler
Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.010
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(2), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
Freina, L., Baroni, G., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). Emotive concept nouns and motor responses: Attraction or repulsion? Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.4.493
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701625550
Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00326
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.001
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00430